I really enjoyed reading about the different concepts of Web 2.0. Because I use it so frequently, I never really took a moment to step back and look at all of it's components individually. I liked how the author laid out the differences in styles of websites with Web 2.0. For example, the idea that webpages are looked at like books. And that blogs aren't particularly webpages, but rather posts to the same webpage. Wikis are described as a stream for conversation, which is ultimately the greatest function to date of Web 2.0 in my opinion. It is hard to think of anything that goes better together than communication and learning. The two being tied together is key to successful learning experiences. The openness of Web 2.0 allows for a webpage to go from being "book-like" to a two way access webpage.
Having the ability to have two way access is essential, especially when it comes to higher education. I can hardly imagine furthering my schooling with Web 2.0, and I can say that I feel spoiled in that regard. School sites are perfect for interactive learning through Web 2.0 because it allows for groups of students to share ideas, as well as professors or even entire classes. Not only is it engaging and interactive for groups of students, but it is widely used as an ease of access to administrative websites. If I logged onto my school's homepage now almost every link that followed would have the option to "contact us" or even chat live in some cases allowing the student to have full access to multiple people on campus at any given time. All this would be impossible without Web 2.0, so yes, I do believe that Web 2.0 is considered a new wave of innovation for teaching and learning. How could it not be?